不知道大家有沒有看在場的一位中國女生對于這種MIT教授的提問，說話邏輯非常好，我聽了好幾遍，索性做了一個雙語版的視頻。

?下面這是對話內容，不是特別的精準，因為翻譯過來的，但是主要內容是沒問題的。

英文原文：

中國女生提問者：

okay thank you for giving me that chance.thanks for the good talk and uncovering the bad practices in AI research and raise awareness to preserve the reputation of this community as a whole. um but just throughout the presentation. I noticed that there's only one slide where you

explicitly

mention the nationality of the researcher that's about the Chinese students, but you also put a note that most of the Chinese students you met are honest and upright so I just have this question is it because most of the Chinese students are very good uh which caused the fact that whenever you notice one or two bad people that nationality especially caught your attention there um because there are other bad practices you mention but they didn't mention the nationality there yeah um. I hope that's true.

MIT 教授:

let me clarify on that, that was not based on my judgment, that was based on the students quote, saying that the school was not teaching it, which meant that it applied to a lot of people from there. I have not seen that I put what I have seen which is all the Chinese people I've worked with have with actually the one exception I mentioned have been wonderful. so I'm very happy pro and maybe that's it maybe this one maybe their comment was who knows what I hope it was an

outlier

中國女生提問者：

yeah thanks for that clarification think that's also uh probably showing that these students are upright and honest. so that they give you this reflection but still I personally as a Chinese find that a bit offensive, because that's the only place where you explicitly mention nationality. although you've mentioned a lot of bad practices. I think it's important that we preserve a good reputation outside this community, but within this community we also raise awareness on

unconscious bias

and probably this

racist problem

. I hope in the future if you present this again, you can remove that

nationality note

because that seems unfair for this special group of people.

MIT 教授：

Thank you so much for speaking up about that and I think I will take your advice and remove it. thank you very much

中文翻譯：

中國女生提問者：

好的，謝謝你給我這個機會。謝謝你的精彩演講，揭露了人工智能研究中的不良行為，并提高了人們的意識，維護了整個社會的聲譽。我注意到，只有一張幻燈片明確提到了研究人員的國籍，那是關于中國學生的，但你也提到，你遇到的大多數中國學生都是誠實正直的，所以我有個問題，是不是因為大多數中國學生都很好，所以每當你注意到一兩個壞人時，那個國籍就會特別引起你的注意，嗯，因為你還提到了其他一些不良行為，但他們并沒有提到國籍，是的，嗯。我希望這是真的。

麻省理工學院教授：

讓我澄清一下，那不是基于我的判斷，那是基于學生的引述，說學校沒有教，這意味著它適用于那里的很多人。我沒有看到這種情況，我所看到的是，與我共事過的所有中國人，除了我提到的一個例外，都非常優秀。所以我很高興，也許就是這樣，也許這一個人，也許他們的評論是誰知道呢，我希望這是一個例外。

中國女生提問者：

謝謝你的澄清，我想這也說明了這些學生是正直和誠實的，所以他們才會給你這樣的反映，但作為一個中國人，我個人還是覺得這有點冒犯，因為這是你唯一明確提到國籍的地方。我認為重要的是，我們要在社區外保持良好的聲譽，但在社區內，我們也要提高對無意識偏見和可能存在的種族主義問題的認識。我希望以后如果你們再提出這個問題，可以去掉那個國籍的注釋，因為這對這個特殊群體來說似乎是不公平的。

麻省理工學院教授：

非常感謝你能說出這個問題，我想我會采納你的建議，刪除它。

為什么出色呢？

專業性 (Professionalism)

·表現:回擊以禮貌、冷靜的語氣展開，全程避免情緒化表達，沒有直接指責對方，而是通過邏輯和提問引導對方反思。

·具體例子:

"Okay, thank you for giving me that chance. Thanks for the good talk and uncovering the bad practices in air research and raise awareness to preserve the reputation of this community as a whole."

·解釋:開篇先表達感謝，認可對方的努力。這種積極的開場降低了討論的對抗性，同時為后續批評鋪墊了良好的氛圍。

"I personally as a Chinese find that a bit offensive because that’s the only place where you explicitly mention nationality, although you’ve mentioned a lot of bad practices."

·解釋:用“personally”將觀點歸結為個人感受，而非全面指責，顯得謙遜且理性，讓對方更容易接受。

建設性 (Constructiveness)

·表現:提供了清晰的邏輯推理，并提出了明確建議，而不是單純表達情緒化的不滿。

·具體例子:

"I hope in the future if you present this again, you can remove that nationality note because that seems unfair for this special group of people."

·解釋:通過具體建議（remove the nationality note），明確指出可以改進的地方，使批評具備建設性，避免讓對方感到無助或被攻擊。

"There are other bad practices you mention, but they didn’t mention the nationality there. Is it because most of the Chinese students are very good, which caused the fact that whenever you notice one or two bad people, that nationality especially caught your attention there?"

·解釋:通過提出一個開放性問題（open-ended question），引導對方自我反思。這種方法避免了直接批評，同時暗示了問題所在，使得溝通更有效。

注重社區價值 (Community Values)

·表現:批評不僅限于個人感受，而是擴展到對整個學術社區（academic community）的影響，強調維護群體聲譽的重要性。

·具體例子:

"I think it’s important that we preserve a good reputation outside this community, but within this community we also raise awareness on unconscious bias and probably this racist problem."

·解釋:將問題提升到學術社區的層面，強調“reputation”（聲譽）和“unconscious bias”（無意識偏見），不僅突出問題的嚴重性，還彰顯了批評的正當性和教育意義。

這一套組合拳下來，這個MIT教授的發言就跟小丑似的，這種“建設性批評”的效果就是對方不得不接受自己被打臉，還得笑臉相迎別人的建議。

因為最后這個中國女生給出的建議是這樣的：

"I hope in the future if you present this again, you can remove that nationality note."

這是一個明確的改進方向，而不是模糊地要求“改進”。這種建議既直接又合理，讓對方更容易采取行動。

最后，MIT 教授，小丑。